TopMyGrade

GCSE/Geography/Edexcel

T1.5Earth’s tectonic hazards: plate tectonics, plate boundary types, the global distribution of earthquakes and volcanoes

Notes

Tectonic Hazards

Plate tectonics fundamentals

The Earth's lithosphere is broken into large slabs called tectonic plates that float on the semi-molten asthenosphere. Heat from Earth's core drives convection currents in the mantle; where these rise, plates are pushed apart; where they sink, plates are pulled together. This movement — a few centimetres per year — causes earthquakes and volcanic eruptions at plate boundaries.

Types of plate boundary

Boundary typeMovementHazardsExample
Constructive (divergent)Plates move apartGentle eruptions, rift earthquakesMid-Atlantic Ridge; Iceland
Destructive (convergent)Oceanic subducts under continentalExplosive volcanoes, deep earthquakesAndes; Japan Trench
CollisionTwo continental plates collideFold mountains, earthquakes (no volcanoes)Himalayas; Alps
Conservative (transform)Plates slide past each otherPowerful earthquakes, no volcanoesSan Andreas Fault; Caribbean Plate boundary

Hot spots occur mid-plate over mantle plumes — e.g. Hawaii (shield volcanoes, gentle eruptions of basaltic lava).

Distribution of earthquakes and volcanoes

Both cluster along plate boundaries, visible on global hazard maps:

  • The Pacific Ring of Fire (destructive boundaries around the Pacific) accounts for ~90% of the world's earthquakes and ~75% of active volcanoes.
  • The Alpine–Himalayan Belt produces major collision-zone earthquakes (Nepal 2015, Turkey 2023).
  • Mid-ocean ridges have frequent, low-magnitude earthquakes and effusive eruptions.

Measuring earthquakes

  • Richter scale (logarithmic): each step = 10× ground motion amplitude. Magnitude 7+ is major; 8+ is great.
  • Mercalli scale (ordinal I–XII): measures felt intensity at a given location — depends on distance from epicentre and local geology.
  • Epicentre = point on Earth's surface above the focus (hypocentre); shallow focus earthquakes (<70 km) cause most damage.

Contrasting case studies: Nepal earthquake (2015) vs Japan earthquake/tsunami (2011)

Nepal earthquake, April 2015 — LIDC

  • Magnitude 7.8; focus 15 km (shallow) on the Main Boundary Thrust, collision boundary between Indian and Eurasian plates.
  • Primary impacts: ~8,900 deaths; 600,000 structures destroyed; Kathmandu Valley severely damaged; avalanche triggered on Everest.
  • Secondary impacts: 2.8 million displaced; landslides blocked rivers; cholera threat; tourism collapsed.
  • Factors increasing vulnerability: poor building quality (adobe/brick), steep terrain, limited emergency services, high poverty (HDI = 0.602), remote mountain villages inaccessible.
  • Response: international aid (India, China, UK, USA); UN OCHA coordinated; slow to reach remote areas; rebuilding took years — only 50% of households rebuilt by 2020.

Japan (Tōhoku) earthquake + tsunami, March 2011 — HIC

  • Magnitude 9.1; destructive boundary where Pacific Plate subducts under North American Plate; 30 km focus.
  • Primary impacts: 15,900 deaths (mainly from tsunami, not ground shaking); coastal towns obliterated; Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant meltdown.
  • Secondary impacts: nuclear exclusion zone; $235 bn economic damage; supply-chain disruption worldwide.
  • Factors reducing casualties from shaking: Japan's strict building codes (base isolation, reinforced concrete), early-warning system (80 s alert), earthquake drills.
  • Response: Self-Defence Forces deployed 107,000 personnel within 3 days; $250 bn reconstruction package; temporary housing for 330,000 displaced; robust insurance system.

Key contrasts (HIC vs LIDC)

FactorJapan (HIC)Nepal (LIDC)
Deaths15,9008,900
Buildings destroyedMostly older coastal homesMajority of housing stock
Emergency responseHoursDays–weeks
Economic recovery~10 yearsStill ongoing
Disaster risk reductionSeismic codes, early warningEmerging Sendai Framework adoption

Management: prediction, preparation, protection

  • Prediction: seismometers, GPS ground deformation monitoring, radon gas sensors. Earthquakes remain unpredictable in timing; volcanoes give more warning (increased seismicity, ground inflation, gas emissions).
  • Preparation: building codes, evacuation drills, early-warning systems, land-use zoning away from fault lines.
  • Protection: base isolation (Japan), cross-bracing, fire-resistant materials; tsunami sea walls (Japan built 14 m walls after 2011).

Edexcel B exam technique

Extended response (8 marks, L1–L3): structure as — introduce the pattern/process → apply to named case study A → apply to named case study B → evaluate/assess the contrast. Always use place-specific data (magnitudes, death tolls, GDP values).

AI-generated · claude-opus-4-7 · v3-edexcel-geography

Practice questions

Try each before peeking at the worked solution.

  1. Question 14 marks

    Plate boundaries and tectonic hazards (4 marks)

    Explain why earthquakes occur at conservative plate boundaries. [4 marks]

    Ask AI about this

    AI-generated · claude-opus-4-7 · v3-edexcel-geography

  2. Question 28 marks

    Examine contrasting tectonic hazard impacts (8 marks)

    Examine why tectonic hazard events have different impacts in countries at different stages of development. [8 marks]

    Level mark scheme (Edexcel B levelled):

    LevelMarksDescriptor
    L11–3Simple statements; limited or no use of case study evidence; generic factors listed.
    L24–6Some developed explanation; case study evidence used but may lack detail or balance; some comparison attempted.
    L37–8Detailed, balanced analysis; specific data from two contrasting case studies; clear examination of how development level shapes impacts; evaluative conclusion.

    Indicative content:

    • Economic capacity: HICs (e.g. Japan 2011) invest in earthquake-resistant buildings, early-warning systems, emergency services → reduce primary deaths. LIDCs (e.g. Nepal 2015) have weaker building stock and fewer resources.
    • Governance: Japan mobilised 107,000 troops within days; Nepal's response was slower and relied heavily on international NGOs.
    • Physical factors that interact with development: Nepal's rugged terrain and Haiti's liquefaction-prone soils amplified impacts regardless of development; Japan's tsunami sea walls were partly effective.
    • Secondary impacts: Economic disruption proportionally greater for LIDCs (Nepal's GDP fell ~1%; Japan's reconstruction was 4% of GDP but absorbed).
    • Conclusion: Development level is the primary determinant of impact, but physical factors (depth, proximity to settlements, soil type) interact with it — award L3 only if this complexity is acknowledged.
    Ask AI about this

    AI-generated · claude-opus-4-7 · v3-edexcel-geography

  3. Question 36 marks

    Predict and prepare for tectonic hazards (6 marks)

    Assess the extent to which prediction reduces the risk from tectonic hazards. [6 marks]

    Level mark scheme:

    LevelMarksDescriptor
    L11–2Basic statements about prediction methods; no evaluation of effectiveness.
    L23–4Explanation of how prediction reduces risk; some assessment of limitations; some evidence.
    L35–6Balanced assessment; evidence from named examples; recognition that prediction is more effective for volcanoes than earthquakes; evaluative conclusion.

    Indicative content:

    • Volcanoes: Pinatubo 1991 — seismic monitoring + ground deformation detected 2 months before eruption; 60,000 evacuated, thousands of lives saved. Prediction can be highly effective.
    • Earthquakes: no reliable short-term prediction technology exists; Japan's P-wave early-warning gives 80 s warning — enough to stop bullet trains and alert hospitals but not evacuate cities.
    • Limits: false alarms cause "cry wolf" complacency; politically difficult to order evacuations; poor countries cannot afford monitoring networks.
    • Conclusion: prediction significantly reduces risk for volcanic events but is near-impossible for earthquakes; preparation and building quality are more important for seismic risk reduction.
    Ask AI about this

    AI-generated · claude-opus-4-7 · v3-edexcel-geography

  4. Question 42 marks

    Distribution of tectonic hazards (2 marks)

    Describe the global distribution of volcanoes. [2 marks]

    Ask AI about this

    AI-generated · claude-opus-4-7 · v3-edexcel-geography

Flashcards

T1.5 — Tectonic hazards: plate tectonics, distribution and contrasting case studies

8-card SR deck for Edexcel Geography topic T1.5

8 cards · spaced repetition (SM-2)